Environmental Assessment in Several Project Locations in Aceh Province
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
general public. Various ways to overcome environmental pollution caused
by various constructions such as factories, industries, building construction
and others have been carried out. One way is to supervise every industrial
activity that is carried out. The main objective of this research is to study the
extent to which technological approaches in environmental management
have been carried out so far. In addition, this paper aims to find out what
technologies can be used to minimize the impact on society when
construction is carried out. The findings indicate that the noise level
measured at the activity location is still below the safe point. The highest
noise level is 50.2 dBA, while the quality standard for residential areas is 55
dBA. The results of vibration measurement at the location of the activity are
also still at a safe point or below the established quality standards.
Meanwhile, the results of air pollution analyzed at the research location are
still relatively safe. Overall, the results of the analysis carried out showed that
it was still below the established quality standards. However, when
construction activities are carried out, it is estimated that they will increase
significantly. Thus, several technological approaches are needed to detect
noise, vibration and air pollution when construction has started.
Article Details
References
Canter, L. W., & Wood, C. (1996). Environmental impact assessment. New York:
McGraw-Hill Inc.
Du, W., & Li, M. (2019). Can environmental regulation promote the governance of
excess capacity in China’s energy sector? The market exit of zombie enterprises.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 306–316.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.267
Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 41 of 1999
concerning Air Pollution Control.
Hafezi, M., & Zolfagharinia, H. (2018). Green product development and
environmental performance: Investigating the role of government regulations.
International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 395–410.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.012
Hahn, R. W. (1984). Market power and transferable property rights. The Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 99(4), 753–765.
Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel
data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.
Jin, P., Peng, C., & Song, M. (2019). Macroeconomic uncertainty, high-level
innovation, and urban green development performance in China. China
Economic Review, 55, 1–18.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.02.008
Jumini, S. (2018). Fisika Kedokteran. Wonosobo: Penerbit Mangku Bumi.
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (1996). Keputusan Menteri Negara Lingkungan
Hidup No. 48 Tahun 1996 Tentang: Baku Tingkat Kebisingan. Keputusan
Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup, (48).
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (1996). Keputusan Menteri Negara Lingkungan
Hidup No. 49 Tahun 1996 Tentang Baku Tingkat Getaran.
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (1997). Keputusan Menteri Negara Lingkungan
Hidup Nomor: Kep-45/MenLH/10/1997 Tentang Indeks Standar Pencemar
Udara. Jakarta.
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (2014). Keputusan Menteri Negara Lingkungan.
Kep-48/Menlh/11/1996 Tentang Baku Tingkat Kebisingan. Online). (http://web.
ipb. ac. id/~ tml_atsp/test/Kepmen% 20LH% 2048% 20Tahun.
Maisonneuve, N., Stevens, M., Niessen, M. E., Hanappe, P., & Steels, L. (2009).
Citizen noise pollution monitoring. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual
International Conference on Digital Government Research: Social Networks: Making
Connections between Citizens, Data and Government (pp. 96–103). Digital
Government Society of North America.
Majumdar, S. K., & Marcus, A. A. (2001). Rules versus discretion: The productivity
consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 170–
Marquis, C., & Bird, Y. (2018). The paradox of responsive authoritarianism: How
civic activism spurs environmental penalties in China. Organization Science,
(5), 948–968.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the
environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
(4), 97–118.
Qi, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Local environmental enforcement constrained by
central–local relations in China. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(3), 216–
Ramanathan, R., Ramanathan, U., & Bentley, Y. (2018). The debate on flexibility of
environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance
– A novel use of DEA. Omega, 75, 131–138.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.02.006
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in
dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy
of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292.
Soemarwoto, O. (2016). Analisis mengenai dampak lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah
Mada University Press.
Sunu, P., & Putra, R. M. S. (2001). Melindungi lingkungan dengan menerapkan ISO
Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia (Grasindo).
Wang, J. (2018). Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of
Singapore and Hong Kong. Research Policy, 47(2), 399–412.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.008
Yi, S., & Xiao-li, A. (2018). Application of threshold regression analysis to study
the impact of regional technological innovation level on sustainable
development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 89, 27–32.